Ask an Economist
There are very few places to find county-level farm rental rate information. Iowa State has conducted a long-running survey on farm rental rates. That data is provided in the ISU Cash Rental Rate Map (...
Small business owners who most effectively use economics knowledge to the advantage of their business do so through the lens of unit economics. What are the per-unit expenses of the business and how do those expenses compare to revenues per unit...
John Green, Nicole Swepson, and I recently completed a paper, College Quality as Revealed by Willingness-to-Pay for College Graduates, that addresses this question. First, we examined the correlation between traditional measures of...
You can do a lot of different things with an economics degree so it's a bit of a tough question to answer. Of course, one thing you can do is be an economist. The Bureau of Labor Statistics has an overview of what that kind of position entails...
A seller has market power if it is able to PROFITABLY price higher than the competitive price because it has a downward sloping demand curve and sets its output where marginal revenue equals marginal cost but sets its price above its marginal...
There seems to be two questions here.
- For a couple with kids and highly unequal incomes, what is the best way to make expenditure decisions? (Do both individuals get equal votes? Would that be unfair to the higher-earning individual...
Let's recall that inflation is usually computed as a year-on-year (annual) percentage change in the consumer price index. Therefore, CPI inflation for June 2021 will compare the CPI in June 2021 to the CPI in June 2020. Hence, inflation of say 6....
As is usually the case in economics and economic data analysis, the answer is "it depends."
From a theoretical standpoint "The" interest rate is not really something that exists in the real world, it is more of a conceptual tool that...
My short answer from ten years ago: When consumers are made better off in the short and long run.
My short answer today: That’s a toughie.
My long answer: You have actually hit on a question...
You have described an economic concept called tax incidence. There is a wealth of studies centered around this in the field of public finance. The basic question, similar to what you have articulated, is who bears how much tax burden? There is...
With a major in Economics, one does NOT need to decide on a specific career field until they graduate when they likely will have multiple options to choose from. The Econ degree will prepare graduates for various career paths, even if the...
Q. Whenever a country signs up to an IMF package, there is a sudden increase in inflation which is difficult to control. My question is why does that occur?
A. Countries, usually, approach the IMF as a last resort measure after...
Thanks for your question. I’m glad to hear about your interest in the financial sector. A degree in economics has many different career tracks: a policy analyst in government, a business analyst understanding how prices influence...
In many ways, data is indeed just another item that can be bought and sold on a marketplace: there is a demand for it, and there are organizations willing to supply it for a price. So what can we learn from a basic supply and demand analysis?...
(1) Can the Federal Government pay for something (like some fighter jets) just by electronically putting appropriated "funds" into Boeing's (or some other company's) bank account, without having obtained those funds in advance from taxation or borrowing? (I'm not asking whether this is a good idea, I'm asking if this is possible)
(2) Does the Federal Reserve ever give "cash infusions" to banks by just electronically increasing their reserves, without buying back federal securities from that bank? If so, doesn't this automatically increase the value of the bank's stock, and isn't this kind of a windfall to the bank's investors? (As opposed to reducing reserve requirements, or buying federal securities from the bank, which would seem to require the bank to then engage in useful economic activity (lending) in order to benefit the shareholders?
The first question essentially asks, I think, whether the U.S. Treasury can spend money it doesn't have (i.e., can it "overdraft" its account at the Federal Reserve). When the Treasury purchases goods and services from a private business, that...
Imagine two trades. The first is between a millionaire and a barista at Starbucks. The millionaire pays $4 for a latte. The producer surplus is $4 and the millionaire's consumer surplus is $0, because he's just not that into coffee. Now imagine a second trade between a pauper and the grocery store. The pauper pays the grocery store $3 for some rice which he will use to halt his near-starvation. The grocer's producer surplus is $3, and because the pauper has only exactly $3 (and is therefore only willing and able to make a trade for a maximum of $3), the pauper's consumer surplus is $0. There are no externalities: the hunger isn't going to make the pauper less efficient at work and he is not going to die of starvation, there's nothing wrong with the global supply chain of coffee in this world, and there are no witnesses who might benefit from some weird intangible altruistic benefits or something like that.
If you had to wave a magic wand and make one of these trades impossible (for example, by making either the millionaire or the pauper forget his wallet right before the store closes), which would you choose to preserve to maximize utility in the economy?
My (very limited) understanding of classical economics is that $4>$3, so the latte should be preserved. This strikes me as completely ridiculous. I find it hard to believe that given the choice between a latte you don't want all that much and the extreme disutility of near-starvation, that anybody would choose the latte. I think a rational actor forced to weigh contradictory evidence (between a supply and demand graph that says $4>$3, and any empirical observation of the utility of lattes and disutility of near-starvation) will choose to preserve the rice trade.
Do I have this wrong? Am I mistaken as to what an actual economist would argue here?
If utility isn't exactly equal and linear for everybody, how can we make decisions like "should we tax group A to pay for a service for group B?" If utility is irregular, is it predictably irregular? Do we over-measure the utility of the rich and under-measure the utility of the poor?
I'm fascinated by these problems, and I'm looking for good sources to learn more. Can you point me in a good direction?
The concept of utility was introduced to represent decision makers' ordinal preferences. That is, if I like alternative A better than alternative B, I can represent this ordinal preference by assigning utility values to alternative A and...
There are two ways to think about this question, one straightforward and one more interesting. To address the former, we can think of the “robots” as simply additional humans who add to the economy in the same way as a normal person: they save...
I am not familiar with the report you mention, but conceptually it is possible to construct and measure GDP by specific demographic groups, say by educational levels, race/ethnicity, gender, or age. The precision of those indicators would depend...
I am wondering how I would go about finding the underlying data. Any help or guidance is appreciated.
There are several sources of publically available data on swine production costs and returns.
The Iowa State University Estimated Livestock Returns (http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/...
I know lots of top economists say high inequality is bad but those are usually in the US or UK and not in developing countries. I thought maybe an initial 'spurt' of inequality may boost growth? I know Deng Xiaoping created some inequality in China, which eventually led to rapid growth. A similar thing happened in India. I also thought that maybe inequality shouldn't be looked down upon as maybe it reflects a higher standard of living in countries. Assuming migration laws stay relaxed, countries with higher standards of living should have higher inequality as poor people flock to them, right? South Africa has a high GINI whereas Malawi has one way lower. Paul Collier also says that developing countries should develop market economies to catch up with the rest of the world but this will further increase inequality, right?
But the evidence suggests the complete opposite of what I think. Africa as a continent is the second most unequal continent in the world and the poorest. Why do you think that is? Do you think decreasing inequality will benefit the region? A Kuznets curve suggests that a country may have to go through mass inequality before reaching a stable level, but the African continent defies this as it's highly unequal yet still underdeveloped. What do you think causes this?
Income is the return of factors, such as labor, human capital and physical capital, that you own and exchange with other agents in the economy. Income inequality in different countries may arise for different reasons and thus it is difficult...
1) money velocity is low but inflation will soon come when the economy opens up
2) CPI and PCE are broken and are not good measures of inflation. Inflation is already here but reflected in housing, healthcare, and equities instead of milk and eggs.
3) QE actually leads to deflation
1) I thought that perhaps the lack of significant inflation is due to the low money velocity (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M2V). Perhaps once the economy opens up, people will spend more leading to an increase in money velocity, which finally leads to inflation. I have heard that people are saving more since restaurants are closed and travel is dead (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PSAVERT) (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PSAVE). I have also heard that the drastic rise in equities and real estate are due to people spending more on assets. However, if it is assumed that people are saving more, how can net savings as a percentage of national gross income be negative? (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/W207RC1Q156SBEA)
2) Perhaps CPI and PCE are broken measures of inflation. At least in California, food is slightly more expensive, housing (whether renting or owning) is very much expensive, and healthcare is stratospherically expensive. Perhaps there already is inflation and everyone is looking at the wrong measurements?
3) Is it possible that QE actually leads to deflation? The rise in equities and real estate has benefited those who already own these assets to begin with (i.e. rich people) and the bottom 90% of people are living off credit, stimulus, and savings. Rich people save more than they spend and thus have a negligible effect on money velocity. Poor and middle-class people spend more and make up 90% of the population; so if they had money to spend, they would spend it, thus increasing money velocity. Is it possible that the bulk of QE is going to rich people who just throw it at equities and real estate while the other 90% gain little from QE. Overall, aggregate demand would decrease for consumer goods. And as stuff that actually matters such as healthcare and housing continue their upward rise, the 90% would have even less to spend on consumer goods, further decreasing aggregate demand. I imagine this is the so-called K recovery. This theory would also explain why net savings as a percentage of GNI is negative. Assuming GNI is still positive (https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/MKTGNIUSA646NWDB) (the latest data is from 2019), this would mean that net savings is negative and most of the U.S. population is surviving off credit. I imagine that the drastic increase in wealth of the top 10% skews personal savings and personal savings rate, though I have no idea how these are calculated on a national scale.
It is impossible to predict the future, but I would like to hear from an economic perspective why any or all of these theories are wrong.
Inflation is the rate of change of the price level (i.e., the “cost of living” as measured in dollars). The standard framework economists use to understand price changes is supply versus demand. For example, if supply of an item (i.e...
Currencies that are fully pegged to USD will continue to buy the same amount of US dollars. So a peg, by definition, keeps the exchange rate fixed against the base currency, which in this case is USD.
Now USD has depreciated (went down as...
This is an interesting question with a complicated answer. The short answer is that in the long run unbundling parking would probably 1) benefit landlords, 2) benefit tenants without cars, 3) increase costs for tenants with cars, and 4) lead to...
Similar to the response of your AP Micro teacher -- part (potentially a large part) of the gender wage gap can be accounted for by the differences in the fields and positions that working men and women hold in the workforce. This study <...
The RR is one instrument the Fed uses to control money supply or the amount of money in circulation. The Fed deems that the other instruments, such as open market operations, are better. One reason the Fed discontinued reliance on the RR is that...