Impacts of Trade on Civilization
Past: Trade encouraged the innvention of letters (Lenders needed a means of keeping records of loans) in the early stage of civilization. (Sumerians invented cuneiform —wedge shaped— letters in the Biblical city of Uruk around 3300 BC.)
Present:
1. Trade promotes peace among nations, e.g., European Union. There have been no large scale wars in Europe since WWII.
2. Trade encourages exchange of ideas and encourages new inventions. For example, China or any other country does not need to reinvent light bulbs.
3. Trade is a great civilizer. (Trade civilizes traders and contributes to a gradual reduction of racial prejudice among traders. One cannot hate the Japanese people and love their products. Trade promotes mutual respect for fellow human beings that produce quality products.)
Future
1. Increasing global trade encourages small countries to adopt the language of a larger trading bloc. Common language builds confidence among different races. Global trade will lead to the adoption of a universal language. (English or Chinese?)
2. Factor price equalization (wait until we cover this topic in the Heckscher-Ohlin model).
3. Convergence of per capita incomes. (K/L ratio falls as income rises)
|
Sumerian instruments of writing. |
![]() Ancient Babylonian clay tablet (c. 2500 BC) |
![]() |
|
See the similarity of Cretan and Japanese syllabaries. Cretan Linear B
Syllabary copy |
Hiragana
(Japanese) copy |
![]() |
Three Major Early Civilizations
1. Indus Valley Civilization - arose around 2500 BC. Harappans built public baths and cultivated cotton. Their cities such as Mohenjodaro (now in Pakistan) had brick buildings, brick covered streets. Here are a couple of terracota objects from Mojenjo-daro.
|
Pipal (a kind of fig) tree or Tree of Life, Mohenjo-daro, 2500 BC |
Lord of Animals, Mohenjo-daro, 2500 BC (Smithsonian Institution) |
|
![]() |
2. Mesopotamia: Sumerians invented writing and beer. It began around 2700 BC. Abraham was born in a Sumerican city of Ur of Chaldea.
3. Chinese civilization: Chinese began to use pictographs from Shang dynasty
(1766 - 1050 BC). Chinese who settled around Yangtsu River developed sericulture
(silk). More on this later.
![]() |
A ritual wine container, from Anyang circa 1200 BC. Shang Dynasty (1766- 1050 BC). Smithsonian Institution. |
![]() |
Burial jade disc. Eastern Zhou dynasty (770 - 221 BC). Compare these with Etruscan art below. |
(Smithsonian Institution)
(British museum) |
Etruscan bronze pots. Etruscans were the early settlers in Northern Italy. The first king Tarquin (616 - 578 BC) was an Etruscan. See Etruscan Art for more. |
![]() |
![]() |
Consumption dependence = Average Propensity to Import = M/Y
APMNetherlands = 50%
APMUS = 3 - 4% until 1960s, but has been increasing, ~ 11%
Income dependence, X/Y = Export-income ratio. In 1991 1. Kuwait ? 2. Switzerland 35% 3. Japan: 10% 4. Sweden 28% 5. Norway 45 6. Finland 22 7. Denmark 36 8. Germany 34 9. US 11 10. Canada 25 11. France 23 17. UK 24 18. Singapore 185 19. Hong Kong 141 107. China 20 125. Uganda 7
Y = value added
X = total value of goods exported
So X/Y can be greater than one.
(X + M)/2Y in 1985
Canada 28% France 24% Germany 33% Italy 27% J 15% UK 28% US 8.5%
1. GNP would probably fall. How much? Need more information about the structure of the economy.
2. Prices will be affected. The prices of importables would rise, while those of exportables decline.
Because steel is used as inputs in many other industries, the US economy would probably collapse. Some industries may have to find close substitutes for steel. For example, the auto industry has used aluminum and plastics as substitutes for steel. However, the absence of steel would cause a bottleneck in most countries.
![]() |
A steel plate from a blast furnace, Pohang Steel, South Korea. |
![]() |
Rolled steel plates. December 2006. |
Cutting our external trade would cause a similar bottleneck in our economy. England or Japan, which heavily rely on foreign trade would probably collapse when trade is eliminated by external forces such as earthquakes or electromagnetic storm in the solar system.
The US probably could cope with such disaster better than any other countries. But we would still suffer from a significant reduction in our standard of living.
For example, coffee, tea and cocoa have to be foregone.
The US is the country that is most abundantly endowed with natural resources. But there are only two kinds of metals that the US has enough and does not import from the ROW.
Molybdenum: a metal used as alloy with iron to make high-speed cutting tools, as drill bits and electric saw blades.
Magnesium: a metal that burns with dazzling white light, used as flare, antacids.
What damage could be done to the US economy or national security by the loss of access to foreign supplies?
US has stockpiled some 500 million barrels in its strategic petroleum reserves to cope with possible shortages.
Mineral Import (% of C) Source Manganese 100% South Africa Bauxite 100 Australia Platinum 88% Canada Tungsten 75% ChinaRemark: One may argue that if trade is not allowed, the US could still survive. We could produce close substitutes for all imported goods. I guess the US is the only country which can survive and function adequately without trade. Japan would collapse. Russia has already collapsed, and is slowly recovering.
The real question is not whether the US is capable of surviving or not, but the question is whether the cost of producing the import substitutes is higher than the cost of imports. We are importing those because it is cheaper to import than to produce those goods ourselves in the domestic market.
Large countries tend to manage without trade, but small countries would suffer most when imports are eliminated.