A small island (with 3 houses) in Helsinki harbor. Whether this small island
joins a free trade area or not, it will hardly affect the prices in Helsinki
or EU. All gains from free trade go to the small country.David Ricardo only asserted that specialization maximizes national income of each trading country, but did not explain how trading countries will find the equilibrium prices when they trade.
Offer curves are use to determine equilibrium price of a traded good.
Figure 17a, Derivation of an Offer Curve
By changing the prices from the autarky level, one can obtain different free trade consumption bundles, as shown in Figure 17a. As long as free trade price ratio (p*1/p*2) is great than its autarky counterpart (slope of the PPF), then free trade production always occurs at point B. Free trade consumption bundle depends on the actual price. By connnecting the free trade consumption bundles chosen as the price changes, one can obtain the offer curve.
However, it is more convenient to express the offer curve in terms of traded goods. Instead of using the above origin (0) in Figure 17a, one can use the free trade production point B as the new origin and retrace the offer curve as shown in Figure 17. The trade vector can be written as: (z1,z2) = (x1 - y1,x2 - y2). The free trade production point B is now the new orgin, B = (0,0), representing the autarky equilibrium.
This diagram uses trade space (in terms of import and export volumes)
Combine two offer curves, O (domestic) and O* (foreign).
If one country is not disproportionately large or small, the intersection of two offer curves yields the equilibrium terms of trade, which falls between two autarky (relative) prices.
Equilibrium price ratio is p*1/p*2 =Imports/Exports. This price ratio is often called the terms of trade.
The free trade price will generally be somewhere between the two autarky prices of two trading countries.
However, if one country is very large, then the free trade price may reduce to the autarky price of the large country. In this case, the large country does not gain at all, whereas the small country reaps all the gains from trade.
Trade promotes the adoption of one language for trade purposes.
Since small countries reap all the gains from trade, the large country
has no incentive to initiate trade. Accordingly, traders of small countries
must learn and adopt the dominant language of the large coutry or trading bloc
(Choi, 2002). This is one reason why citizens of small countries in Europe and
elsewhere are learning English and why American are reluctant to learn foreign
languages. Citizens of small European countries often speak English and a few other European languages.
![]() Hieronymus Bosch |
Traders speak many languages In the Passion of the Christ, Pontius Pilate talks to the crowd in Aramaic (not true.) Attributed to Hieronymus Bosch, early 16th century, Philadelphia Museum of Art. In an outburst of pity, Pilate may have said one phrase in Latin, "Ecce homo" (Behold the man) to the crowd but would have conversed with his prisoner in Latin:, "Quod est veritas?" (What is truth?) Otherwise, Pilate spoke to the crowd in Greek (not in Aramaic), then the business language of the Mediterranean world, but talked to Roman soldiers in Latin. Via Maris, an ancient caravan route from the Mediterranean coast to Capernaum and thorough Mesopotamia was passing through Sephoris, 4 miles northeast of Nazareth. Living close to Sephoris on the trade route, Joseph and his son could have plyed their trade in Sephoris and would have been fluent in Greek and Latin, as well as Aramaic, much as modern Europeans (except the French) speak several European languages. |
Will the wage rates be equalized between the two countries?
No.
The equilibrium price of a traded good is determined by the world supply and demand curves. However, factor prices are not determined by the world supply of and demand for inputs.
Output prices are equalized by free trade, but input prices are not equalized between countries. How are the factor prices determined?
Perfect Compeition implies:
p1 = aL1 w.
p*2 = aL2* w*.
Thus, the factoral terms of trade, w/w*, is:
w/w* = (p1/p2*)(aL2*/aL1) [not equal to 1].
While the Ricardian theory with two goods convincingly shows which of the two goods a country will export, it is not very helpful in deciding which products to export when there are many industries. A country cannot simply export one good and import the rest, i.e., (n - 1) goods. If there are n commodities, a country is likely to export some and import the rest. The theory of comparative advantage does tell us that a country cannot import or export all goods.
Note that in a world of two goods, the HC does not have a CA in good 2. If good 2 were produced, its unit cost would be
p2 = aL2 w > p*2 = aL2* w* (domestic cost of good 2 is greater than its foreign cost).
Also, since the HC has a CA in good 1,
p1 = aL1 w < p*1 = aL1* w* (domestic unit cost of good 1 is less than its foreign cost)
Since labor productivities differ between countries, it is generally impossible to force wage equalization in two export industries. The workers receive their value of marginal products in each industry in which the country has a CA. That is,
pi = aLi wi < p*i = aLi* wi* (domestic unit cost of good i is less than its foreign cost, if the HC has a CA in good i)
The HC specializes in every comparative advantage industry (its domestic unit cost is less than the foreign cost). It is important to note that the above inequality cannot hold for all industries, in which case the HC exports all goods, and hence trade will not be balanced.
Since wage rates are different in these industries, domestic workers fill up the industries that pay the highest wage first and gradually move to other industries with lower wages.
Competitive Advantage
"Competitive Advantage" is often used in the business world. A firm is said to have a competitive advantage when it can sustain above normal profits compared with other firms in the same industry. It can maintain a competitive advantage when (i) either its production cost is lower than its rivals, or (ii) its product has more desirable attributes than those of its rivals at the same cost.
Country 1: specializes in 1
Country 3: specializes in 2
Country 2: diversifies, i.e., produces both goods, 1 and 2, and facilitates
trade between countries 1 and 3, even though it does anot reap any gains from
trade.
Figure 20.
Implication: Most countries beneifit from trade by specializing in the good in which it has a comparative advantage because the world price of its exportable is higher than its autarky price. The country in the middle may not gain if the world price is equal to its autarky price.
For example, Europe, Japan and North America (excluding Mexico) have a compative advantage in the capital intensive goods or services, but China and India have a comparative advantage in labor intensive goods. Both regions gain from trade. However, other countries in Asia that are neither abundant in capital or labor may not gain much from trade.
He compares the ratio of US to British exports in 1951 with the ration of US to British labor productivity for 26 manufacturing industries. His data shows a positive correlation between the labor productivity and exports.
Evaluation
In Ricardo's model each country specializes and exports only one good. It is not adequate to explain the pattern of trade between countries which produce many goods. If there are many industries, they can be ranked in terms of comparative advantage. If there are n industries, one country exports the first m good in which it has a comparative advantage and imports the rest, i.e., (n - m) goods in which it has a comparative disadvantage. However, if there is more than one factor (e.g., capital and land inputs), this chain cannot be established.
References
Choi, E. Kwan, "Trade and the Adoption of a Universal Language,"
International Review of Economics and Finance 11 (2002), 265-75